Hassan11
03-14 10:45 AM
from my personal experience and from others, you can't get to talk to an Immigration Officer by calling the 1-800 number. you need to get an Info pass appointment and that way you can talk to an IO.
good luck
When ever I call the customer service they say they are unable to get more information. So I was wondering who can be contacted to get the accurate information about our case.
good luck
When ever I call the customer service they say they are unable to get more information. So I was wondering who can be contacted to get the accurate information about our case.
wallpaper short haircuts
WhatsInaName
09-01 10:21 AM
My friend's company is India recently applied for his L1B visa. He is scheduled to go for stamping next week. But, another company has already premium-filed his H1B petition and is expected to hear back from the USCIS anytime now.
Here's the question: if he gets his L1B visa first, can he later on try and get his H1B visa and enter the country with the H1 visa? Second, if he goes for H1B stamping right after his L1B stamping, will it affect the visa officer's decision in issuing a H1 visa?
Last question: he has already spent 3 years in the US on a L1B visa. So, if he comes here on a H1B visa, will the 6-year term limit count his 3 yr. stay on L1 visa or will a new clock start when he enters on H1?
Please chime in if anyone has done this before or has any insight on this matter.
Here's the question: if he gets his L1B visa first, can he later on try and get his H1B visa and enter the country with the H1 visa? Second, if he goes for H1B stamping right after his L1B stamping, will it affect the visa officer's decision in issuing a H1 visa?
Last question: he has already spent 3 years in the US on a L1B visa. So, if he comes here on a H1B visa, will the 6-year term limit count his 3 yr. stay on L1 visa or will a new clock start when he enters on H1?
Please chime in if anyone has done this before or has any insight on this matter.
abc
06-14 02:21 PM
With this mejob workload of I-140 filiing in next 2 months, I-140 procesing times will again retrogress.
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
2011 Celebrity short hair styles
sagar_nyc
11-25 09:10 PM
try to look for dates in late night/ early morning , i think that time they open new slots and it gets fillled up quick
What do one have to do to get a visa appointment in one of the US embassy's in Canada?
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
What do one have to do to get a visa appointment in one of the US embassy's in Canada?
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
more...
Blog Feeds
04-26 11:30 AM
Even though America's Jewish community includes virtually known of the folks being targeted by the anti-immigrant law in Arizona, members of the community get nervous when they see individuals in another minority group being targeted unjustly. Laws that demand that people show their papers make Jews especially concerned since in generations past (think Nazi Germany) in other countries, similar laws were part of campaigns of persecution. The first group to weigh in, appropriately, was the state's Reform Rabbis. It's rather refreshing that this is the case because 47 years ago when Northern rabbis went down to Birmingham, Alabama to support...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jewish-organizations-speak-out-against-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jewish-organizations-speak-out-against-arizona-law.html)
ARUNRAMANATHAN
06-06 08:57 AM
Like it !
more...
forsite
07-08 10:12 PM
Hi Friends,
My EAD expires in the mid of August.I am planning to go india at last week of July.I thought of applying for EAD renewal now.But my lawer said it is always preferrable that the candidate must present in US while processing EAD renewal.Is it ok if I apply for renewal after I come back from India.By that time,My EAD already expires.Will it be a problem If I apply for renewal after expiry of current EAD.I am currently on H1B visa and I am not using EAD status now.If it is a problem,I will postpone my India trip.
Thanks
My EAD expires in the mid of August.I am planning to go india at last week of July.I thought of applying for EAD renewal now.But my lawer said it is always preferrable that the candidate must present in US while processing EAD renewal.Is it ok if I apply for renewal after I come back from India.By that time,My EAD already expires.Will it be a problem If I apply for renewal after expiry of current EAD.I am currently on H1B visa and I am not using EAD status now.If it is a problem,I will postpone my India trip.
Thanks
2010 most popular short hairstyles
vinsug
03-04 10:37 AM
Vivek, thanks a lot for replying to my issue.
rgds
Vinsug
rgds
Vinsug
more...
kirupa
03-20 08:17 PM
Added!
hair long to short hairstyles
snhn
04-24 04:46 PM
Hello all
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
more...
ivoiceuser
02-11 05:47 PM
Hello,
Here is my situation :
1) Labor filed in EB3 in June 2004. The labor was filed in non-PERM and approved. I-140 was filed in Aug 2007 and it is approved in Dec 2008 with Priority date of June 2004
2) Labor filed in EB3 with same company in May 2006 through PERM. Got approved in 2 months and I-140 applied and approved within 12 months in April 2007. Priority date is May 2006. Applied for 485 in Aug 2007 and have EAD/AP based on it.
I am no longer with the company (quit after 180 days after 485 was applied) and am working for another company on H1B using AC21.
Question is, can I port priority date for 485 processing from May 2006 to June 2004 in my case where I have changed employer. Note that by time June 2004 I-140 is approved, I am no longer with that company.
Regards,
ivoiceuser
Here is my situation :
1) Labor filed in EB3 in June 2004. The labor was filed in non-PERM and approved. I-140 was filed in Aug 2007 and it is approved in Dec 2008 with Priority date of June 2004
2) Labor filed in EB3 with same company in May 2006 through PERM. Got approved in 2 months and I-140 applied and approved within 12 months in April 2007. Priority date is May 2006. Applied for 485 in Aug 2007 and have EAD/AP based on it.
I am no longer with the company (quit after 180 days after 485 was applied) and am working for another company on H1B using AC21.
Question is, can I port priority date for 485 processing from May 2006 to June 2004 in my case where I have changed employer. Note that by time June 2004 I-140 is approved, I am no longer with that company.
Regards,
ivoiceuser
hot Short hairstyles for blonde
prajwal123
05-27 04:09 PM
Can I work with different employer without my sponsor company knowing about it? I have a EAD and I can change jobs(180 days is over). Now planning to start a company/to work on W2 with new company. I want to use the medical benefits from sponsor company(withought quitting the job).
currently I am on Bench. so parent company not paying anything. I appreciate your responses.
Please let me know any good immigration lawyer in Newjersey (princeton) area.
Thanks
currently I am on Bench. so parent company not paying anything. I appreciate your responses.
Please let me know any good immigration lawyer in Newjersey (princeton) area.
Thanks
more...
house short hairstyle with and
Macaca
03-11 06:42 PM
Some paras from Securing Iraq Votes, One at a Time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/10/AR2007031001300.html) -- House Democratic Leaders Methodically Build Support for War Plan
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
tattoo short black hair styles
krishna_brc
09-22 12:54 PM
Can we work for a Charity Organization without getting paid while on H1?
The work would probably be 2 hours a month.
Thanks,
Krishna
The work would probably be 2 hours a month.
Thanks,
Krishna
more...
pictures women. short haircuts for
validIV
04-30 10:33 AM
I believe some lawyers still do 245(i). The fee is $1k. Talk to an immigration lawyer or google "245 (i)"
dresses Short bob Hairstyle
Blog Feeds
08-30 09:40 AM
Most people think the Border Patrol just patrols the border. But Nina Bernstein reports in the New York Times this morning that the agency is involved in doing checks on Amtrak trains going between major cities like Chicago and New York that don't actually go by the border. Border Patrol officers roam the trains asking people for their papers documenting US citizenship or a legal right to be in the US. The story reports that many people - particularly students - have been removed from the trains even though they had proper documentation. In one case, a Pakistani student was...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/coercive-unconstitutional-and-tainted-by-racial-profiling.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/coercive-unconstitutional-and-tainted-by-racial-profiling.html)
more...
makeup short hairstyles with wavy
Blog Feeds
04-26 11:30 AM
Even though America's Jewish community includes virtually known of the folks being targeted by the anti-immigrant law in Arizona, members of the community get nervous when they see individuals in another minority group being targeted unjustly. Laws that demand that people show their papers make Jews especially concerned since in generations past (think Nazi Germany) in other countries, similar laws were part of campaigns of persecution. The first group to weigh in, appropriately, was the state's Reform Rabbis. It's rather refreshing that this is the case because 47 years ago when Northern rabbis went down to Birmingham, Alabama to support...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jewish-organizations-speak-out-against-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jewish-organizations-speak-out-against-arizona-law.html)
girlfriend Curly Short Hairstyles 2011
stormrider0610
March 23rd, 2010, 12:06 PM
i have it on Nikon mount, and one of the samples i tested had a back focus issue. i just bought the one that didnt. Sigma is real good at fixing/replacing defective lenses
I have to agree with that, I did send it back to Sigma and 3 weeks later it was fixed and now I seem to have focussing issues with my A700 and a couple lenses that seem to work fine on my A300 but this Sigma works really well on the A700 and A300.
I have to agree with that, I did send it back to Sigma and 3 weeks later it was fixed and now I seem to have focussing issues with my A700 and a couple lenses that seem to work fine on my A300 but this Sigma works really well on the A700 and A300.